US Accuses Shiites of Faking Massacre
March 27th, 2006 by Ape ManAlertnet| US Accuses Shiites of Faking Massacre.
Obviously this story could be one of several things. Here’s one that I think will be preferred by one segment of our readership - things happened basically like the US military said they did, and the Shiite political leadership is trying to frame the US military for a massacre that didn’t occur. There’s another that will probably be preferred by a different segment of the readership - things happened basically like the Iraqis said they did, and the US military is full of shit.
I’m agnostic on that question; we really don’t have any information beyond he-said, she-said. But the problem in this case with the wingnut-preferred story (which once again could easily be 100% accurate) is that if that’s the explanation, that’s really, really bad news for the US occupation of Iraq. The Shiites are our only allies in the main, populated, actually war-torn part of Iraq. If their leadership is really trying to frame us for massacring people, that’s a bad sign, right?
I think before we actually hear the crazy convoluted contortions that will be required of those who want to conclude that the Shiites are framing the US military for a massacre without also concluding that things have taken a monstrous turn for the worse in Iraq, we should all take a large step back and agree that anyone who takes this position, no matter what flashy justification he provides for taking it, is probably either lying or howlingly, barkingly stupid.
Keep in mind this happens on the very day in which Juan Cole noted ominously that strange things are afoot at the Circle K. I don’t know any better than he does what this means, but I think prolly it ain’t good:
Then the US and Iraqi forces say they raided a terror cell in Adhamiyah. Adhamiyah is a Sunni district of Baghdad and is still Baath territory.
But somehow the joint US-Iraqi force ended up north, at the Shiite Shaab district. They say that they took fire from Mahdi Army militiamen. But there aren’t any such Mahdi Army men in Adhamiyah. I have a sinking feeling that instead of raiding a Sunni Arab building in Adhamiyah, they got disoriented and attacked a Shiite religious center in nearby Shaab instead. Iraqi television angrily showed twenty unarmed corpses on the floor of the religious center, denouncing the US for killing innocent worshippers. The US military is now saying it did not enter any mosques and that anyone killed was killed by Iraqi special ops.
The Mustafa Husayniyah, however, is not a mosque and may not have been distinguishable as a religious edifice to non-Shiites. Shiites mourn their martyred Imams, the descendants of the Prophet, in centers called Husayniyahs after the Imam Husayn, the grandson of the Prophet Muhammad. As for the killing being done by Iraqi troops, if it was a joint mission, then the US forces are going to take some of the blame.
At least one of the dead was a member of the Dawa Party, the party headed by Prime Minister Ibrahim Jaafari. Official Iraqi television coverage was also uncharacteristically anti-American.
One thing BRT sort of hinted at in comments many posts ago is that he doesn’t get why we think it’s bad if there’s a civil war in Iraq while US forces are occupying the country. Well, one reason is that in Iraq, a civil war is going to be extremely confusing for Westerners. Mistakes will be made. Mistakes will mount. Enough mistakes and the US becomes just another faction fighting for its life, fighting for resources, fighting for land.
And in the end, of course, fighting for nothing. Such is the tragedy of war. Those who love war (talking not just about wingnuts now, but all those wonderful liberal hawks too, the Ken Baer’s and the George Packers and the Josh Micah Marshalls) can never see it. They never understand why we crazy liberals seem opposed to war simply because it’s war, and for no other reason. Such softheadedness. Such unseriousness.
You folks refused to look at history, so here it is again, one more time, for the cheap seats. Gaze upon what you have wrought. Look at it, really look. May God have mercy upon you.

March 27th, 2006 at 8:55 pm
And just for fun…
March 27th, 2006 at 9:24 pm
Great post. Love the Busey pic.
March 28th, 2006 at 1:46 am
I’m certainly willing to wait for the results of the official investigation, but I’m afraid that many Iraqis will assume a planned massacre regardless of the findings.
Such a massacre wouldn’t make any sense from a strategic point of view, but I think we’ve poisoned the well of Iraqi public opinion to the point that many will believe the worst, regardless of the evidence or the circumstances.
March 28th, 2006 at 4:14 am
[…] « US Accuses Shiites of Faking Massacre Note to Democrats: Time to Stop Thinking, and Start Doing » […]
March 28th, 2006 at 8:24 am
Here is an interesting analysis of the events and what may be going on in Iraq.
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2006/03/sundays_gunfight_in_iraq.html
March 28th, 2006 at 9:09 am
Nice try aileron but they won’t read it. “Real Clear Politics” is to bats what
garlic is to-well…..
Besides Kelly was a green beret who has a military background and actually
knows what elements cost us a victory in Vietnam. Hint:It wasn’t China,Russia or the Viet Cong.
So, not a chance. See if you can find Katrina vanden Huevel, Arriana Huffington, Salon or Markos’ take on things.
Little bat tongues lapping it all up…..
March 28th, 2006 at 11:27 am
Wingnuts spend too much time wondering if the Shi’ite anger is justified instead of noticing that the Shi’ites are angry.
March 28th, 2006 at 12:51 pm
aileron–
Frankly, I don’t think Kelly knows what he’s talking about.
1) When Khalilzad called for a crackdown on the militias, he was talking about expelling them from the Iraqi Interior Ministry and army. Those forces have been thoroughly infiltrated by the Badr forces, which are controlled by the SCIRI.
2) Al-Sadr and Sistani have had a tentative alliance for some time now. After the bombing of the al-Askari mosque, Sistani asked al-Sadr to have his Mahdi army protect Sunni mosques from reprisals.
3) The death squads seem to be mostly Badr forces, not al-Sadr’s Mahdi forces. American forces have caught Badr members, who were also Interior Ministry policemen, on their way to execute a Sunni. That’s the event that led to Khalilzad’s demand that the Interior Ministry be cleaned up. We’ve had to dismantle torture chambers that these guys set up, and witnesses to death squad activity often report that they’re wearing the uniforms of the Interior Ministry’s police.
4) The idea that the Badr and Mahdi organizations are somehow maginalized from the Shia population is hogwash. Badr is supported directly by SCIRI, Mahdi is supported directly by al-Sadr and tacitly by Sistani. That’s pretty much all of the most influential clerics in Iraq right there.
In short, Kelly’s report is about as wrong on the facts as it could possibly be.
March 28th, 2006 at 12:55 pm
Damn, gordo, you beat me to it. I’ll just add that I think it’s interesting how many of this dude’s theroies and predictions are contradicted by the very next post here at the Liberal Avenger.
March 28th, 2006 at 12:56 pm
Oops. Theories.
March 28th, 2006 at 10:24 pm
Wingnuts spend too much time wondering if the Shi’ite anger is justified instead of noticing that the Shi’ites are angry.
Word.
March 29th, 2006 at 10:01 pm
It would appear that the US is now backing away from the “faking” allegation and has reluctantly admitted that they fucked up:
[Link]
Once again the incompetence of our military and our government collide with the absurdity of war.