Malkin’s Allahpundit: Catholic-hater
February 8th, 2007 by LALook who else allegedly hates Catholics!
Michelle Malkin’s own Allahpundit of HotAir.com!:
Do Catholics really believe they are eating Christ when they take the host? Allah knows that your priests have a taste for flesh–the younger the better, it seems–but this is ridiculous. And you have the gall to mock Muslims for believing that Satan lives in their nostrils at night? Allah will admit that we have our eccentric beliefs like any other faith, but at least cannibalism is not part of the core curriculum. Stop chewing on Jesus, you ghoulish fucks.
In my book that’s as bad as anything Amanda wrote. I wonder what that wingnut Donohue from the Catholic League would think? Looks like Allahpundit needs to update his resume.
[Update: To all wingnuts who have come forward with the “revelation” that Allahpundit’s post was satirical… Ummm, really? I thought he was being himself when he said “Stop chewing in Jesus, you ghoulish fucks.” You mean he didn’t really mean that?! Wow! No way!?]
[Thank you, UKNow in comments]
February 8th, 2007 at 10:57 pm
I just want to thank all concerned for your constant attention. I will wear a thong tonight to help with your dreams.
Sincerely,
MM
February 8th, 2007 at 11:01 pm
More Lib, you want her. Badly.
February 9th, 2007 at 12:01 am
Just like Republikkkans enjoy the killing of American soldiers.
February 9th, 2007 at 12:05 am
OMGs, that’s fucking hilarious!
February 9th, 2007 at 12:08 am
I mean, seriously, if you don’t believe transubstiatamagiger, you’re Satan’s bitch! Am I right Dana?
February 9th, 2007 at 12:45 am
We were talking about christianist “creationist’s” belief that Jesus walked the earth about the same time as dinosaurs, and I pictured Jesus in a Fred Flintstone car, feet all flapping out the bottom, saying “Yahweh-daaba-do!”
Why did Jesus kill all those dinosaurs?
February 9th, 2007 at 12:48 am
Wow, I know nothing of this Allahpundit person, but that’s fairly humorous stuff, at least coming from a Malkinite. I’m guessing it’s parody or something, but that’s pretty sophisticated for a wingnut. He’s lacking the sting of a real parody and needed a more realistic model in mind, but overall, it wasn’t bad.
And for the record, I’m not sure if parody counts the same as Amanda’s stuff. I’ve said some extremely offensive things in parody that I’d never say straight, and that’s just a different standard. But then again, if irreverence and vulgarity are the only standard, then I suppose there is no real difference and this guy deserves to get screwed for what he wrote.
As a side note, my General Boykin parody in Yahoo got my account closed because it was so offensive. Too bad, because that was some pretty funny stuff. Frankly, I was just pleased that I was the first to grab General Boykin’s name in Yahoo. And to be honest, I wouldn’t doubt that Boykin himself would approve of what I had him saying. Yes, it was that offensive.
February 9th, 2007 at 12:51 am
Just more fun and frolic from the American Talban.
February 9th, 2007 at 1:01 am
[…] [Hanx! Liberal Avenger] […]
February 9th, 2007 at 2:48 am
Why does Flintstone even use that car? What’s the advantage? Am I missing something here?
Oh yeah, and stop eating the Jesus crackers, OK?
February 9th, 2007 at 3:08 am
Because they were Democrats.
D.I.N.O. get it?
February 9th, 2007 at 6:23 am
[…] Of course, Donohue and Malkin are both hypocritical bullies. They are neither civil nor tolerant. They’re nothing more than bullies who attacked because they thought that Edwards had put himself in a vulnerable position. […]
February 9th, 2007 at 7:47 am
Sirkowski asked me:
February 9th, 2007 at 8:48 am
This crap from Mrs. Malkin, and this Donohue twerp just gets goofier by the minute.
Edwards has done the right thing.
He told them to go take a strong laxative and sit on the throne for awhile, in so many words.
Way to go Edwards!
February 9th, 2007 at 9:13 am
Jesus Crackers? You know, if you put milk on them, they become Christ Chex.
February 9th, 2007 at 9:15 am
allahpundit.com was absolutely brilliant. His series of Kerry cartoons were legendary.
So, which Republican presidential nominee was smart enough to hire someone that irreverent and “anti-Catholic?” You were saying?
February 9th, 2007 at 9:19 am
Yes. You are missing the fact that Fred had a horrible tendency to build up callouses. If he didn’t run the car daily, the tough dead skin would build up to such an extent that he would walk lopsided.
It’s great to finally get the truth out!
February 9th, 2007 at 9:42 am
Oh my God. I just read the whole allahpundit post, and remembered how he used to write first-person parody of radical islam. The whole post was a parody you morons. Are you saying that When Amanda wrote “jeebus” or “godbags” 800 times, she was being ironic? She got a freaking Masters in “gender studies” because she’s not obsessed with “the patriarchy” she’s just being ironic and making a parody?
You are truly idiots.
February 9th, 2007 at 9:56 am
Is jebus even an insult? You realize it’s a running joke from The Simpsons and Family right? Idiot.
February 9th, 2007 at 9:57 am
*Family Guy. Oops.
February 9th, 2007 at 10:35 am
come on guys — this and other posts slandering my good name and that of the great Allah. I’m just a poor little Asian cutie trying to make a living selling t-shirts to dupes.
- shoot illegals? Dip bullets in pigs blood? Nuke Mecca? Its all good as long as you remember I’m angling for that fox news Gig. Heck if you guys are a little nicer I might just give you an interview with some softball questions. Jesse, er I mean I’m pretty good at writing those.
thank god we don’t condone censorship at hotair like you all do here.
xxxooo
shell
February 9th, 2007 at 10:42 am
Did you even read your own link?
February 9th, 2007 at 11:02 am
“Is jebus even an insult?”
You need to get sirk to do a spell check for you carlito.
Nutroots spell it “Jeebus”……..
February 9th, 2007 at 11:33 am
It’s as much satire as anything Allah’s said, coming from a satirical show. Idiot.
Personally I like this definition best:
February 9th, 2007 at 12:08 pm
I didn’t realize that the Simpsons were writing for a presidential candidate?
Here is Amanda’s intelligent discussion of parental notification laws. Very ironic, I’d say. Lots of humor here. The 3% of Democratic voters that ironic man-hating feminists shrews attract are going to love her.
February 9th, 2007 at 12:16 pm
Very ironic, I’d say. Lots of humor here. The 3% of Democratic voters that ironic man-hating feminists shrews attract are going to love her.
That’s right, only man-hating feminist shrews think that it’s wrong for a father who raped his daughter to be allowed to decide if she can have an abortion or not. Everyone else says, “Sure, her father raped her, but he’s still her father.”
I guess conservatives are all about letting criminals make decisions about what their victims can do with their lives.
February 9th, 2007 at 12:50 pm
According to Gallup / USA Today, 69% of American adults favor parental notification laws, yet Amanda focuses on “the patriarchy” preserving its right to rape their daughters. And you agree. Well, I’m not going to spell it out for you. Please go volunteer for a Democratic campaign, so you can share your mainstream beliefs with the people.
February 9th, 2007 at 1:13 pm
According to Gallup / USA Today, 69% of American adults favor parental notification laws,
Are you saying that these 69% favor parental notification laws even in the case of incest? That 69% of Americans believe that a father who has raped and impregnated his daughter still retains the right to dictate whether or not that daughter gets to carry his child/grandchild, her sibling, to term? And do you count yourself as one of those who believes that it is a father’s God-given right to make the decision for the daughter that he has raped and impregnated as to whether or not she gives birth to her father’s child/grandchild?
February 9th, 2007 at 1:54 pm
It reminds me of the Mohammed cartoons.
Jesus… save me from your anti-semitic followers!
Oh, and Carlito, since when is a REPUBLIC moved by poll numbers?
February 9th, 2007 at 2:01 pm
carlito Says:
February 9th, 2007 at 12:50 pm
According to Gallup / USA Today, 69% of American adults favor parental notification laws,
Hey, wingtoon, i thought all polls were bogus unless they showed Burns crushing Tester?
Hey wingtoon, did we s-t-e-a-l the 2006 elections? Hahaha
February 9th, 2007 at 2:02 pm
So if a Republicunt makes fun of Jesus it’s humor but if I do it it’s suddenly vulgar?
You didn’t get it, did you?
February 9th, 2007 at 2:07 pm
“According to Gallup / USA Today, 69% of American adults favor parental notification laws, yet Amanda focuses on “the patriarchy” preserving its right to rape their daughters.”
That’s about the standard ratio for all sane, rational, patriotic Americans vs Moonbats issues carlito; 70% to 30%.
The way it works is that the moonbats (actually about 8%) are able to convince some 20% of Americans-mostly those in elementary school, mental institutions, professorial ranks at liberal universities, in the computer programming field, the news media and other assorted non or marginally productive fields and institutions, mostly in the blue states-to blindly accept their convoluted views by lacing their arguments with useless brain numbing statistics, through the looking glass rationales, blame shifting, warped historical parallels dating back to the Peloponnesian war and beyond, red herrings, straw men, ad hominem attacks and egregious self serving canards.
Persuading pollsters to substitute the word “Duh” for “No” is the largest single factor however…
February 9th, 2007 at 2:11 pm
Geniuses, which of these things happens more often:
a) Dad rapes his daughter, she wants an abortion and is forced to notify him (despite judicial review workaround in notification laws)
b) 30-something man takes advantage of vulnerable underage girl, pays for her abortion, no one knows without parental notification laws
Nikki, your whole argument is a stilly strawman.
February 9th, 2007 at 3:07 pm
Carlito, your hands have no business in little girl’s private parts.
February 9th, 2007 at 3:23 pm
bedrocktruth Says:
February 9th, 2007 at 2:07 pm
“That’s about the standard ratio for all sane, rational, patriotic Americans vs Moonbats issues carlito; 70% to 30%.”
Like raising the minimum wage? Supporting troop drawn-down? repealing the bankruptcy bill?
“warped historical parallels dating back to the Peloponnesian war and beyond, red herrings, straw men, ad hominem attacks and egregious self serving canards”
Victor Davis Hanson, is that you? Get back to grading midterms RIGHT NOW!
February 9th, 2007 at 4:56 pm
“Marginally productive”? Get off the Internets NOW, BRT.
February 9th, 2007 at 5:51 pm
“get back to grading midterms RIGHT NOW!”
Finished that up several days ago Max.And thanks loads for the opportunity to break in my “What a maroon”!! stamp…
February 9th, 2007 at 8:32 pm
Carlito, considering that Amanda’s post that YOU linked to was specifically about legislators in Utah deciding that, yes, a father who raped his daughter should be notified before she’s allowed to have an abortion, you’re being a little disingenuous by changing the subject and insisting that, hey, it doesn’t happen all that often anyway.
Your defense of abusive and incestuous fathers is pretty frightening, especially since it seems to impact your reading comprehension.
February 9th, 2007 at 9:19 pm
Thanks for the revelation, wingnuts, that Allahpundit was being satirical.
REALLY?! NO WAY! YOU MEAN HE DOESN’T REALLY HATE CATHOLICS?! YOU MEAN HE WASN’T SPEAKING IN HIS OWN PERSONA WHEN HE POSTED THAT?! WOW - THANK YOU FOR BRINGING THAT TO OUR ATTENTION!!!!! I THOUGHT THAT WAS WHAT HE REALLY ENJOYS SAYING TO HIS CATHOLIC FRIENDS AND NEIGHBORS!!!
Idiots.
February 9th, 2007 at 9:35 pm
Well, the “feminist news wire” story at the time told me that the “non abusive” parent would be notified, not the “father who raped his daughter.” Notified. That’s it, the abortion still happens.
Do you think that informing a woman that “hey, your piece of shit abusive husband not only raped your daughter, but knocked her up” is somehow patriarchal and frightening? If I were that woman, I’d want to know. Other than the obvious — 14-year-old pregnant girls who are abused might not make great decisions — I’d also like to know that my minor daughter is undergoing outpatient surgery, ya know.
How is my comprehension of this law impacted, when miss Amanda states explicitly that the girl will somehow “stay raped” by having an abortion with her mother notified? Enlighten me please as to how I’m disingenuous and Amanda’s hyperbole is not.
February 9th, 2007 at 9:39 pm
the above was directed a Mnemosyne, not our charming host.
February 9th, 2007 at 10:08 pm
There’s no place too young for a Pedoblican to shove his fingers.
If you were that woman, you’d already know and probably be complicit.
February 10th, 2007 at 12:43 am
carlito–
You simply don’t live in the real world. In the real world, the wives of men who rape their daughters and stepdaughters blind themselves to what’s going on. When their daughters complain of the abuse, they blame their daughters. These “non-abusive parents” will, upon being notified, run to the abusive parent and inform him that the girl is spreading lies about him.
In the real world, girls who are repeatedly abused by their fathers and stepfathers can’t talk to their mothers about it. If their family dynamic was functional enough to allow for such an exchange, then the mother would have already put an end to the abuse, wouldn’t she?
February 10th, 2007 at 10:09 am
It’s really interesting the way moonbats always seem to be able to summon up some kind of twisted rationale for not doing the right thing.
If Susie is tardy or misses classes, parents are notified. If she pulls straight Ds, parents are notified. If she bops another classmate, spits on the bus driver or shoves crayons up her nose,parents are notified.
But if she gets knocked up and has to face a life or death situation for the child she’s bearing and perhaps herself, it’s none of the parents’ damned business.
It may come as a shock, but as much as the bats would like to believe that parents relinquish their parental rights to the state-as they do in those fascist countries they claim to despise-that’s not the way it works in a free society.
Or didn’t at least until the dawning of that wonderful “age of Aquarias”, otherwise known as the dawning of the total screwing up of America.
February 10th, 2007 at 2:30 pm
LMAO @ Carlito. I think he masturbates to the fantasy of “showing those little foulmouthed whores what they get for pissing off daddy Carlito”.
Dude, you are so creepy. But carry on, by all means.
February 10th, 2007 at 2:31 pm
No more worries, BRT’s gonna fart happiness for the kids.
And ya, incest is just the same as getting a D on a math test.
February 10th, 2007 at 4:54 pm
Har-har. Right on target. Go over to Think Progress and check out the ‘Publican farting dinosaur post from our buddy Roar-backer.
February 10th, 2007 at 5:18 pm
Dinosaur flatulence.
That sounds like a John Kerry press release…
And what the hell does that dumb comment mean, sirk?
I have to hand it to you though, it got a biiiiigg laugh out of ole Churl from
Sink Progess…
February 10th, 2007 at 8:19 pm
The ultimate moonbat hypocrisy is that you fuckers are so uptight about the possibility that little Susie might have gotten pregnant through incest that you’re perfectly willing to strip away the God given parental rights of the 95% of parents who DON’T abuse their kids in order to save her from
that remote possibility. On the other hand, you didn’t give a fat damn whether Susie lived or died when she was a fully developed child just a few weeks away from birth if the mother happened to decide she was getting in the way of an Aspen ski vacation, and you don’t give a fat damn right now how many Susies could die as result of your bubble brained “better a 1,000 guilty go free than 1 be wrongly convicted” approach to criminal justice in this country.
How you assholes can even live with this kind of absurd and dangerous double standard, let alone propose it as a realistic approach to insuring the safety, security and general welfare of our children is totally beyond the ken of most sane and rational Americans.
I’m talking the dumb assed 92 per centers that live in that real world just over the grotto rim here….
February 10th, 2007 at 10:27 pm
Bedrock, have you ever met or known of any woman who had an abortion because it would get in the way of a ski trip? Where do you come up with this shit?
I don’t doubt that many women or teenage girls who make the decision to terminate a pregnancy experience some anguish over it. You seem to think that women who have abortions take this nonchalant attitude towards sex like “Well, if I get pregnant, it’s no big deal, I will just have an abortion.”
With respect to parental notification, I am sort of ambivalent about it. In an ideal world, a teenage girl who gets pregnant should feel safe telling her parents what happened to her. One thing I certainly intent to drill into my children is to never be afraid to tell me anything, no matter how bad they think it is. Not all parents are the same though, and I am not comfortable with a cookie cutter approach to a complex situation.
If you see participants in this blog who voice their opposition to parental notification laws, that is because they see it as just a cynical attempt by religious conservatives to chip away at a woman’s reproductive rights.
I’ve said it before here, and I will say it again, for some women who find themselves pregnant but do not feel they are ready to bear and raise a child, an abortion is the best of a limited choice of bad options. Face it Bedrock, for any pregnant woman who is not your wife, daughter or close relative, the decision whether or not to terminate the pregnancy is between her and a medical professional and is, to put it bluntly, none of your fucking business.
February 11th, 2007 at 12:15 am
How do we live with it? In Quebec, we live with it very well. Abortion is free, even in private clinics.
Crime is very low, only 5 murders so far in Montreal this year. People are happy, life is good.
Try it someday.
February 11th, 2007 at 6:57 am
“If you see participants in this blog who voice their opposition to parental notification laws, that is because they see it as just a cynical attempt by religious conservatives to chip away at a woman’s reproductive rights.”
I agree Tommy, and it makes about as much sense as everything else the bats get their panties in a wad about.
The parental notification law doesn’t apply to “women”-18 years or older.
We’re talking about children here, 12-14-16 years of age, living with and being cared for and supported by their parents. And you’re saying the parents have no right to know that their child is about to kill another child and expose herself to physical and mental risk in the process?
But quite naturally the left wing ferrets at the ACSCRU agree with you and the rest of the 8 percenters-if that tells you anything…
February 11th, 2007 at 10:07 am
Bedrock, as I wrote above, it depends on the situation. If all parents were warm and understanding people, then parental notification would be a reasonable requirement. But since not all parents are loving and decent, I would argue that parental notification laws should require some kind of opt-out provision in those “rare” cases where mommy and daddy are not exactly what one might call model parents. If my teenage daughter became pregnant I would want her to swallow her feelings of embarrasment and shame and tell me about it. I would tell her that I would support her in whatever decision she wanted to make.
I used “women” to refer to adult women and those under the age of 18 simply because I was too lazy to keep writing “women and teenage girls”. Just as some people like to refer to men and women as “mankind”.
And BTW, you totally dodged my second paragraph, where I took you to task for implicitly suggesting that women (alright, I will broaden it this time) and teenage girls have a nonchalant attitude towards sex because they figure they will just get an abortion anyway.
An abortion is a surgically invasive procedure, as you know Bedrock. I can’t imagine that any pregnant female looks forward to it with any particular kind of glee. And it doesn’t help when meddling busy-bodies equate pregnant women and teenage girls who want to terminate their pregnancy as being the equivalent of Nazi guards sending Jews into the gas chambers.
The abortion debate is all about a clash of values. Pro-choicers, like myself, to repeat AGAIN, believe that abortion is the best of a limited choice of bad options for pregnant females who are not ready or able to carry the pregnancy to term and care for the child. Anti-choicers on the other hand believe that from the moment of conception, the union of the sperm and egg acquires rights that society is therefore bound to uphold. What we have are two irreconciliable value judgments. And as long as the “pro-life” movement continues to bombard its followers with gory pictures and words like “abortuaries” and “holocaust”, we will continue to have a segment of the population dedicated to interfering (sometimes violently) in what should be a private matter between a woman and her physician.
February 11th, 2007 at 11:20 am
BRT and that other one are what is called trolls, you’re all aware of this?
They will heed no rationnal argument, they’ll claim yours to be wrong without any effort to prove their point, and call you names, then accuse you of doing exactly that. They want to steer debate and discussion away from any constructive point and obtain the angst through which they get to feel like they’ve made a point.
February 11th, 2007 at 11:46 am
“BRT and that other one are what is called trolls, you’re all aware of this?”
No shit, Dick Tracy…
February 11th, 2007 at 12:58 pm
Brilliant logic, this. Who’s calling people names then?
At least tommykey is willing to have a conversation. The sick personal attacks say alot more about the attacker than they do the “troll.”
As for the *actual* argument, we all agree that there are girls in less-than-ideal situations parentally. Despite this, we require their parents (or guardians) to permit them to have medical care of every kind, piercings, tattoos, airplane travel, and on and on. Yet, notification (not even permission) is out of line for obtaining an abortion. I question the real motivation here. The rare cases of incest are horrible, but still rare. There are far more young girls who are being taken advantage of by older men, and free secret abortion enables those men. Notification would help a lot of parents help their daughters.
February 11th, 2007 at 2:29 pm
Trolls don’t have feelings.
February 11th, 2007 at 5:08 pm
“And BTW, you totally dodged my second paragraph, where I took you to task for implicitly suggesting that women (alright, I will broaden it this time) and teenage girls have a nonchalant attitude towards sex because they figure they will just get an abortion anyway.”
I’m not totally sure I know just WHY they have a nonchalant attitude about sex but I’m sure that the liberal induced “anything goes as long as it feels right for YOU, hon”, the “everybody’s doing it” theme of the cinematic swill being pumped out of Pimpwood, free condums supplied in the public schools, easy access to “the pill” and the fact that only about half the states in this country believe that parents should be told that their children are pregnant and seeking an abortion might have SOME teeny tiny influence.
Don’t you?
February 11th, 2007 at 5:33 pm
Ugghh! He still doesn’t get it. Let me state it one more time because you seem to have a comprehension disorder. I find it hard to believe that there is a segment of women and teenage girls who have sex with the attitude of “well, if I get pregnant, I will just have an abortion, so it’s no big deal.”
February 11th, 2007 at 6:09 pm
“I find it hard to believe that there is a segment of women and teenage girls who have sex with the attitude of “well, if I get pregnant, I will just have an abortion, so it’s no big deal.”
Tommy I was just laying out the facts concerning the prevailing attitude of
young people who’ve been forced to grow up in the kind of culture I described.
I never, ever questioned the fact that you, like so many grotto dwellers find it “hard to believe”…
February 11th, 2007 at 7:08 pm
So Bedrock, do you have documentation that a woman had an abortion so that she could go on a ski trip?
February 11th, 2007 at 8:44 pm
What I’d like to understand is if the world is going down the toilet as BRT claims, why is the crime rate continuously going down?
Short answer is, because BRT is full of shit.
February 11th, 2007 at 9:11 pm
Sirk, crime went down in the United States because the Republicans took control of Congress in 95. Once the criminals realized the grownups were in charge, they decided to get real jobs and go to church.